The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was signed into law by President Obama in January, 2011. FSMA establishes requirements for pro-actively preventing food contamination along the entire food value chain. Given the effort and burden required for its proper implementation, SAIC has developed a risk-based process for leveraging the requirement of FSMA to create value through lowering the cost of risk, creating branding opportunities and maintaining shareholder value.
This year the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) has added a new way to participate in the Call for Abstracts process for the Annual Educational Conference (AEC) & Exhibition. It is called, "Be a voice" and it gives you the opportunity to tell us what you’d like to experience at the AEC. Tell us topics you’d like to hear about and speakers you’d like to see. Review abstracts and provide input.
Help NEHA develop a training and education experience that continues to advance the proficiency of the environmental health profession AND helps create bottom line improvements for your organization!To search for specific abstracts, please use the search box located at the top left of the page (*next to the Blogger icon).
HELPFUL LINKS: How to Participate and Use this Blog | Disclosure | NEHA Blog Policy and Participation Guide
ADDITIONAL WAYS TO PARTICIPATE: Submit An Abstract | Suggest a Topic | Suggest a Speaker | Questions?
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Creating Value through the Food Safety Modernization Act
The Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) was signed into law by President Obama in January, 2011. FSMA establishes requirements for pro-actively preventing food contamination along the entire food value chain. Given the effort and burden required for its proper implementation, SAIC has developed a risk-based process for leveraging the requirement of FSMA to create value through lowering the cost of risk, creating branding opportunities and maintaining shareholder value.
Methamphetamine Lab Contamination: A Different Look at the Impact of the Meth Epidemic
The impact of the methamphetamine epidemic is far reaching. Twenty-years ago the only concern with methamphetamine was the crime associated with the drug, i.e. burglary, sexual-assault, child abuse, etc. Over the past decade more attention has been given to the “hidden” impact of methamphetamine – the residual contamination caused by indoor manufacturing and/or smoking of methamphetamine. Smoked methamphetamine and meth labs alike generate airborne methamphetamine. The pyrolytic characteristic of methamphetamine when heated causes the drug to become an aerosol when smoked.In manufacturing, methamphetamine becomes an aerosol during the final
“gassing” phase. Both instances the residue attaches itself to any and all
indoor surfaces, as well as, infiltrates a building’s furnace and/or HVAC
system causing both safety and health concerns to innocent children and adults alike. This presentation will identify the signs of methamphetamine manufacturing; discuss the health hazards associated with exposure to methamphetamine residue; outline West Virginia’s remediation regulations; review the latest manufacturing method; and define the steps to a decontaminated structure.
Sunday, September 11, 2011
Community Engagement and Health Impact Assessments
Why, to what extent and how should the community be involved in environmental health impact assessments? This lecture focuses on what it means to have meaningful community participation, the benefits from community participation and the possible means by which these benefits are conveyed. The lecture will use several theories on community engagement to explore the range of possible tools for participation and propose a formula and specific methods for short and long term projects.
Friday, September 9, 2011
Environmental Health or Economic Development?: The Case of a Federal Facility in Appalachian Ohio
The Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS) is the site of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) former gaseous diffusion plant at Piketon, Ohio in the heart of Appalachian Ohio. From the 1950s through the 1970s, PORTS was one of three facilities in the country that enriched uranium for use in nuclear weapons and nuclear energy production. Uranium enrichment ceased in 2001, and DOE began the process of decontamination and decommissioning the facility. As part of this process, DOE is required to obtain community input on the future of the site and researchers at Ohio University were funded to develop and implement a widespread community outreach program to gather public opinion.
Focus groups, interviews, and a telephone survey were the primary methods of data collection used to enhance understanding of community perceptions related to the plant. Community visioning teams used public opinion data and detailed environmental data to create 9 possible future use scenarios for DOE’s consideration. Results of the public outreach work suggest that there is a range of beliefs and opinions related to the history and future of the site.
However, the common theme that emerged is the importance of using the facility to create jobs for the region, which posts the highest unemployment rates in the state. The scenarios that were selected indicate that the community may be willing to consider activities on the site that might contribute to environmental degradation if there is a promise to improve the economic conditions of the region.